Randomised controlled trial of tetanus treatment with antitetanus immunoglobulin by the intrathecal or intramuscular route

80Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intrathecal therapy with human antitetanus immunoglobulin on clinical profession of and mortality from tetanus. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital, Pernambuco, Brazil. Participants: 120 patients with tetanus allocated to antitetanus immunoglobulin by either the intrathecal and intramuscular route (n = 58) or the intramuscular route (n = 62; control group). Main outcome measures Clinical progression of disease, duration of hospital stay, duration of occurrence of spasms, complications, respiratory infection, respiratory failure or mechanical ventilation, duration of respiratory assistance, and mortality. Results: Patients in the treatment group showed a better clinical progression than those in the control group (χ2 for trend 7.752, P = 0.005; difference in proportion of patients with improvement 20%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 35%). The duration of occurrence of spasms, hospital stay, and respiratory assistance were all shorter in patients in the treatment group: respectively, 14.96, 0.0001 (difference in proportion of patients with spasms lasting ≤ 10 days 36%, 18% to 55%); 4.56, 0.03; and 6.56, 0.01 (proportion of patients who needed assistance for ≤ 10 days 69.2% in the treatment group and 30.8% in the control group (difference 38%, 12% to 65%)). Conclusion: Patients treated with antitetanus immunoglobulin by the intrathecal route show better clinical progression than those treated by the intramuscular route.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Barros Miranda-Filho, D., De Alencar Ximenes, R. A., Alci Barone, A., Luis Vaz, V., Gomes Vieira, A., & Gonçalves Albuquerque, V. M. (2004). Randomised controlled trial of tetanus treatment with antitetanus immunoglobulin by the intrathecal or intramuscular route. British Medical Journal, 328(7440), 615–617. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38027.560347.7c

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free