Human development and gender empowerment: methodological and measurement issues

Abstract

In its Human Development Report 1995 the UNDP came up with two new and potentially very important indicators: the Gender-related Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM). The second of these is the focus of the current article. The GEM is intended by the UNDP to reflect gender 'inequalities in key areas of political and economic participation and decision-making' (UNDP, 1995, rear cover). It is generally consistent with the UNDP's valid concerns about gender issues, especially in developing countries. The purpose of this article is to examine some conceptual and measurement aspects of the GEM. Like many critiques of the HDI which have appeared in the literature, it first looks at the composition and construction of the new indicator. It then points to a number of problems with the GEM, arguing, inter alia, that some issues relating to empowerment across nations are overlooked. It then analyses the determinants of the GEM. Such an exercise has potentially important implications for pro-empowerment policies.