Comparisons of the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of dysmenorrhea between japanese female athletes and non-athletes in universities

14Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the difference in the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of dysmenorrhea between Japanese female athletes and non-athletes in universities. The participants were 18 to 30 years old with no history of a previous pregnancy and/or childbirth. After ap-plication of the exclusion criteria, the cohort comprised 605 athletes and 295 non-athletes. An anon-ymous questionnaire, which included self-reported information on age, height, weight, age at men-arche, menstrual cycle days, menstrual duration, dysmenorrhea severity, sleeping hours, dietary habits, exercise habits, training hours, and competition level was administered. Compared with athletes, non-athletes had a higher prevalence of dysmenorrhea (85.6% in athletes, 90.5% in athletes, p < 0.05); non-athletes also demonstrated increased severity (none/mild 27.8%, moderate 19.3%, and severe 52.9% in athletes; none/mild 21.2%, moderate 17.2%, and severe 61.6% in non-athletes; p < 0.05). Factors related to severe dysmenorrhea in athletes included long training hours, early menar-che, and prolonged menstrual periods. In non-athletes, short menstrual cycle days and extended menstrual periods were related to severe dysmenorrhea. The prevalence and severity of dysmenor-rhea were higher among non-athletes than among athletes; different factors were related to severe dysmenorrhea in these two groups. Thus, different strategies are necessary to manage dysmenor-rhea for athletes and non-athletes in universities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Momma, R., Nakata, Y., Sawai, A., Takeda, M., Natsui, H., Mukai, N., & Watanabe, K. (2022). Comparisons of the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of dysmenorrhea between japanese female athletes and non-athletes in universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free