What We Lose When We "Don't Say Gay": Generational Shifts in Sexual Identity and Gender

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

At a time when anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is on the rise in more than a dozen states across the United States, social work providers and researchers must be acutely aware of the ways in which their practice may unintentionally invalidate the identities of LGBTQ+ youth. Concurrently, language used in the LGBTQ+ youth community to describe both sexual identity and gender has moved away from monosexual and binary labels toward nonmonosexual and nonbinary descriptions. The adoption of such language, in practice and in research, is a simple step toward combatting invalidation in the social work field. This commentary explores the expansion of identity labels through the lens of a study conducted across four leading LGBTQ+ agencies in New York and New Jersey with youth and staff. Authors review data that demonstrate the evolution of labels and argue that adopting these terms in practice and research will have fruitful and affirming effects on access to care, treatment attrition, and the design and quality of research in and for the LGBTQ+ community. This shift in language must be comprehensively addressed to ensure that practice and research continue to adopt and advocate for ways to affirm LGBTQ+ people, particularly given the recent onslaught of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bochicchio, L., Carmichael, A. J., Veldhuis, C., & Stefancic, A. (2023). What We Lose When We “Don’t Say Gay”: Generational Shifts in Sexual Identity and Gender. Social Work, 68(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free