Reliability of physical examination and electrocardiogram in determination of acute myocardial infarction: A hospital based study

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common disorder that makes people seek emergency healthcare, there is little evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs, for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Aims: Current study was done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination & electrocardiogram for detecting acute myocardial infarction compared to the reference standard. Material: Of the 481 patients enrolled, we evaluated 450 patients, 279 (62%) men and 171 women (38%); aged 20 years to 90 years. The patients with acute myocardial infarction were aged almost similar to those without infarction (58.6 vs. 57.1 years). Results: The prevalence of acute myocardial infarction was 41% (187 of 450). Of the 187 patients with acute AMI, 145 (78%) were assigned a discharge diagnosis of ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 42 (22%) were assigned a diagnosis of non-ST elevated myocardial infarction. A total of 34 of 145 (23%) patients with STEMI died, compared to 4 of 42(10%) patients with non-STEMI. Conclusion: Our study concluded that no single sign or symptom or a laboratory diagnostic method with possible acute MI proved effective enough alone to rule in or out AMI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wasalwar, G. V., & Wasnik, D. S. (2020). Reliability of physical examination and electrocardiogram in determination of acute myocardial infarction: A hospital based study. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 12(19), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.12196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free