Optimizing aeration rates via bio-methane potential test for enhanced biodrying efficiency of refuse-derived fuel-3

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aeration forms a critical part of the biodrying of refuse-derived fuel-3 (RDF-3) and significantly affects the fuel’s energy potential. Understanding the organic content (OC) of RDF-3 is crucial for determining the optimal aeration strategy. In this study, we conducted a bio-methane potential (BMP) test to estimate the OC by observing the conversion of organic matter into methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂). The observation of BMP was conducted using anaerobic digestion approach where substrate and inoculum are important parameters considered for the success of this test. Various ratios substrate-to-inoculum (S/I) were explored to assess their impact on biogas production, our research involved testing four S/I ratios (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5) focusing on identifying the optimal aeration strategy. Based on stoichiometric calculations, the sample’s biogas yield per gram volatile solid indicates RDF-3’s OC is 1.5%. This OC value played a role in establishing the appropriate aeration rate (AR) for the biodrying process, which was determined to be 0.6 m³/kg.day, indicating the action of effective microbial degradation processes. Ensuring the correct AR is vital for maximizing the energy potential of RDF-3. Implementing optimized aeration rates based on the BMP test in waste management practices can significantly improve RDF-3 biodrying efficiency. This approach enhances RDF quality, reduces moisture, increases calorific value, and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, leading to more sustainable and efficient waste-to-energy conversion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wahyanti, E., Towprayoon, S., Sutthasil, N., Patumsawad, S., & Wangyao, K. (2024). Optimizing aeration rates via bio-methane potential test for enhanced biodrying efficiency of refuse-derived fuel-3. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 13(5), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2024.60361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free