Quality and representativeness of research online with Yahoo! Crowdsourcing

8Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Conducting research online has become common in human participant research and notably in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI). Many researchers have used English-language and Western participant pool and recruitment platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk and Prolific, with panel quality and representativeness known to vary greatly. Less is known about non-English, non-Western options. We consider Japan, a nation that produces a significant portion of HCI research. We report on an evaluation of the widely-used Yahoo! Crowdsourcing (YCS) recruitment platform. Methods: We evaluated 65 data sets comprising N = 60, 681 participants, primarily focusing on the 42 data sets with complete meta data from studies requiring earnest participation (n = 29, 081). Results: We found generally high completion (77.6%) and retention rates (70.1%). Notably, use of multimedia stimuli exhibited higher completion (97.7%) and retention (91.9%) rates. We also found that the “general” participant setting attracted middle-aged men. Discussion: We offer guidelines for best practice, such as online questionnaire design strategies to increase data quality and filtering to capture a more representative audience. We reveal the nature, power, and limitations of YCS for HCI and other fields conducting human participant research online.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seaborn, K., & Nakamura, S. (2025). Quality and representativeness of research online with Yahoo! Crowdsourcing. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588579

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free