Reply to comment by Añel on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?”

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we reply to a comment made on our previous commentary regarding reproducibility in computational hydrology. Software licensing and version control of code are important technical aspects of making code and workflows of scientific experiments open and reproducible. However, in our view, it is the cultural change that is the greatest challenge to overcome to achieve reproducible scientific research in computational hydrology. We believe that from changing the culture and attitude among hydrological scientists, details will evolve to cover more (technical) aspects over time.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutton, C., Wagener, T., Freer, J., Han, D., Duffy, C., & Arheimer, B. (2017, March 1). Reply to comment by Añel on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” Water Resources Research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020480

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free