Multicriteria Decision Aid to support Multilateral Environmental Agreements in assessing international forestry projects

8Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The three Rio Conventions-the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification-face the challenge to create synergies at different levels. The objective of this article is to describe how we have assessed synergies between the Rio Conventions at the project level in the forest sector. Since the complexity of the decision problem is high, we adopted the Multicriteria Decision Aid approach, which can provide a broad insight into the decision problem and find a compromise solution to a problem with multidimensional and conflicting criteria including social, economic and environmental features. The ELECTRE TRI model was used for assessing synergies at the project level, and has been a useful tool to quantify the performance of afforestation and reforestation projects into three categories (synergistic, reasonably synergistic, and not synergistic). For the first time, afforestation and reforestation projects have been assessed in a comprehensive way through decision criteria that reflect global and local interests using a non-compensatory multicriteria method. © 2010 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cóndor, R. D., Scarelli, A., & Valentini, R. (2011). Multicriteria Decision Aid to support Multilateral Environmental Agreements in assessing international forestry projects. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9125-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free