Quantitative comparison of polar approach versus fitting method in time domain FLIM image analysis

30Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We calculate here analytically the performance of the polar approach (or phasor) in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and F values when performing time-domain Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) to determine the minimal number of photons necessary for FLIM measurements (which is directly related to the F value), and compare them to those obtained from a well-known fitting strategy using the Least Square Method (LSM). The importance of the fluorescence background on the lifetime measurement precision is also investigated. We demonstrate here that the LSM does not provide the best estimator of the lifetime parameter for fluorophores exhibiting mono-exponential intensity decays as soon as fluorescence background is superior to 5%. The polar approach enables indeed to determine more precisely the lifetime values for a limited range corresponding to usually encountered fluorescence lifetime values. These theoretical results are corroborated with Monte Carlo simulations. We finally demonstrate experimentally that the polar approach allows distinguishing in living cells two fluorophores undetectable with usual time-domain LSM fitting software. © 2010 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leray, A., Spriet, C., Trinel, D., Blossey, R., Usson, Y., & Héliot, L. (2011). Quantitative comparison of polar approach versus fitting method in time domain FLIM image analysis. Cytometry Part A, 79 A(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free