Abstract
BELIEVING THAT TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN THEISM IMPLIES THERE IS SOMETHING EPISTEMICALLY WRONG WITH RELIGIOUS UNBELIEF, I EXAMINE JOHN CALVIN'S CLAIM THAT EVERYBODY WOULD BELIEVE IN GOD IF IT WEREN'T FOR SIN. I SHOW WHY THIS CLAIM OUGHT TO BE MORE COMMON THAN IT IS; DEVELOP IT IN TERMS OF OUR NATURALLY HAVING CERTAIN RELIABLE "EPISTEMIC SETS"; UTILIZE THAT DEVELOPMENT TO SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH UNBELIEF; AND THEN ARGUE THAT EVEN UNBELIEVERS HAVE SOME REASON TO THINK IT IS TRUE.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Talbot, M. R. (1989). Is It Natural to Believe In God? Faith and Philosophy, 6(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19896210
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.