Nefarious and Disconcerting Motivations for Choosing a Correctional Officer Position: A Deviant Case Analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most research finds that individuals are drawn to the correctional officer occupation for the pay and benefits or because it provides a new and exciting opportunity. However, these are not the only interests for choosing a correctional officer position. The current study draws on a sample of pre-service correctional officers surveyed prior to beginning their jobs (N = 673). In the spirit of the deviant case method, we focus on a subset of our sample who provided problematic motivations for becoming officers (n = 38). Using a thematic analytic approach, we identified five broad themes within this nefariously/disconcertingly motivated sample: use of force, punitive focus, power and control, cavalier ulterior motives, and problematic social boundaries. We theorize, based on prior research, that these individuals could constitute a meaningful minority that may contribute to the detriment of both their organizations and those they are overseeing. Future research should explore this possibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burton, A. L., Jonson, C. L., M. Petrich, D., & Miller, W. T. (2023). Nefarious and Disconcerting Motivations for Choosing a Correctional Officer Position: A Deviant Case Analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(10), 1506–1525. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231187415

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free