Uncommon Ground: Holism and the future of anthropology

14Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Anthropology has long been a contested field with roots in both scientific and humanistic discourse. The "four-field" approach in American anthropology has been used by some as a means of suppressing conflict and enforcing a false sense of unity. While critiques of the four-field approach are warranted, in fact holism represents anthropology's greatest strength. Anthropology gains a competitive advantage over other disciplines in its ability to combine biological and cultural approaches. Moreover, the four-field model, while historically contingent, is well suited to the institutional and political realities of the American academy, especially the public research university. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harkin, M. E. (2010). Uncommon Ground: Holism and the future of anthropology. Reviews in Anthropology, 39(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938150903548600

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free