Abstract
Anthropology has long been a contested field with roots in both scientific and humanistic discourse. The "four-field" approach in American anthropology has been used by some as a means of suppressing conflict and enforcing a false sense of unity. While critiques of the four-field approach are warranted, in fact holism represents anthropology's greatest strength. Anthropology gains a competitive advantage over other disciplines in its ability to combine biological and cultural approaches. Moreover, the four-field model, while historically contingent, is well suited to the institutional and political realities of the American academy, especially the public research university. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Harkin, M. E. (2010). Uncommon Ground: Holism and the future of anthropology. Reviews in Anthropology, 39(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938150903548600
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.