Role of interfacial interactions on the anomalous swelling of polymer thin films in supercritical carbon dioxide

39Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It has recently been shown that thin polymer films in the nanometer thickness range exhibit anomalous swelling maxima in supercritical CO 2 (Sc-Co2) in the vicinity of the critical point of CO2. The adsorption isotherm of CO2 on carbon black, silica surfaces, porous zeolites, and other surfaces, is known to exhibit anomalous maxima under similar CO2 conditions. It is believed that because CO2 possesses a low cohesive energy density, there would be an excess amount of CO2 at the surfaces of these materials and hence the CO2/polymer interface. This might cause excess CO2 in the polymer films near the free surface, and hence the swelling anomaly. In addition, an excess of CO2 would reside at the polymer/substrate and polymer/CO2 interfaces for entropic reasons. These interfacial effects, as have been suggested, should account for an overall excess of CO 2 in a thin polymer film compared to the bulk, and would be responsible for the anomalous swelling. In this study, we use in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry to investigate the role of interfaces on the anomalous swelling of polymer thin films of varying initial thicknesses, h 0, exposed to Sc-CO2. We examined three homopolymers, poly(1,1′-dihydroperflurooctyl methacrylate) (PFOMA), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene oxide) (PEO), that exhibit very different interactions with Sc-CO2, and the diblock copolymer of PS-b-PFOMA. We show that the anomalous swelling cannot be solely explained by the excess adsorption of CO2 at interfaces. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y., Park, E. J., Lim, K. T., Johnston, K. P., & Green, P. F. (2007). Role of interfacial interactions on the anomalous swelling of polymer thin films in supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics, 45(11), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.21159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free