Premature judment of part of the demand and term of recissory action: Constitutional interpretation of article 975, of civil procedure law

Abstract

The study, by deductive method, is about the inovation of premature judment on part of the demand, provided for in article 356, of Civil Procedure Law, emphasizing that, more than sentence chapter, it is subdivision of the judment, through autonomous interlocutory decision. Verified the legal category of decision, subject to rescindability, through recissory action, begining the term with the last individual decision, not applying the rule of art. 975, do Civil Procedure Law, in other words, the last decision that premature judment of part of the demand.