Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Comparison with discrimination by canines

143Citations
Citations of this article
188Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this work, a chromatographic method for identification of volatile organic compounds was compared with canine recognition. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS) were used for determination of concentrations of trace gases present in human breath. The technique enables rapid determination of compounds in human breath, at the parts per billion level. Linear correlations were from 0.83-234.05 ppb, the limit of detection was the range 0.31-0.75 ppb, and precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was less than 10.00 %. Moreover, trained dogs are able to discriminate breath samples of patients with diagnosed cancer. We found a positive correlation between dog indications and the ethyl acetate and 2-pentanone content of breath (r00.85 and r00.97, respectively). The methods presented for detection of lung cancer markers in exhaled air could be used as a potential non-invasive tool for screening. In addition, the canine method is relatively simple and inexpensive in comparison with chromatography. © Springer-Verlag 2012.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buszewski, B., Ligor, T., Jezierski, T., Wenda-Piesik, A., Walczak, M., & Rudnicka, J. (2012). Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Comparison with discrimination by canines. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 404(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6102-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free