Asperity contacts at the nanoscale: Comparison of Ru and Au

51Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We develop and validate an interatomic potential for ruthenium based on the embedded atom method framework with the Finnis/Sinclair representation. We confirm that the potential yields a stable hcp lattice with reasonable lattice and elastic constants and surface and stacking fault energies. We employ molecular dynamics simulations to bring two surfaces together, one flat and the other with a single asperity. We compare the process of asperity contact formation and breaking in Au and Ru, two materials currently in use in microelectromechanical system switches. While Au is very ductile at 150 and 300 K, Ru shows considerably less plasticity at 300 and 600 K (approximately the same homologous temperature). In Au, the asperity necks down to a single atom thick bridge at separation. While similar necking occurs in Ru at 600 K, it is much more limited than in Au. On the other hand, at 300 K, Ru breaks by a much more brittle process of fracture/decohesion with limited plastic deformation. © 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortini, A., Mendelev, M. I., Buldyrev, S., & Srolovitz, D. (2008). Asperity contacts at the nanoscale: Comparison of Ru and Au. Journal of Applied Physics, 104(7). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2991301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free