Impact of allele-level HLA matching on outcomes after double cord blood transplantation in adults with malignancies

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In single unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT), an increasing number of HLA allele mismatches (MM) has been associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and attributed to higher transplant-related mortality (TRM). Previous studies on the role of allele-level HLA matching after double UCBT (dUCBT) showed conflicting results. In this study, we report the impact of allele-level HLA matching on the outcomes of a large dUCBT cohort. We included 963 adults with hematologic malignancies, with available allele-level HLA matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1, receiving dUCBT between 2006 to 2019. Assignment of donor-recipient HLA match was performed considering the unit with the highest disparity with the recipient. Three hundred ninety-two patients received dUCBT with 0 to 3 MM and 571 with ≥4 allele MM. For recipients of dUCBT with 0 to 3 MM, day-100 and 4-year TRM were 10% and 23%, respectively, compared with 16% and 36% for those with ≥4 MM. A higher degree of allele MM was also associated with the worse neutrophil recovery and lower incidence of relapse; no significant effect on graft-versus-host disease was observed. Patients receiving units with 0 to 3 MM had a 4-year OS of 54% compared with 43% for those receiving units with ≥4 MM. The inferior OS associated with higher HLA disparity was only partially mitigated by increased total nucleated cell doses. Our results confirm that allele-level HLA typing is a significant factor for OS after dUCBT, and units with ≥4 MM (≤4/8 HLA-matched) should be avoided if possible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fatobene, G., Mariano, L., Volt, F., Moreira, F., Conelissen, J., Furst, S., … Rocha, V. (2023). Impact of allele-level HLA matching on outcomes after double cord blood transplantation in adults with malignancies. Blood Advances, 7(13), 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free