Effects of Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 after Core Clerkships on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Performance

20Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of a change in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 timing on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores, the effect of lag time on Step 2 CK performance, and the relationship of incoming Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score to Step 2 CK performance pre and post change. Method: Four schools that moved Step 1 after core clerkships between academic years 2008- 2009 and 2017-2018 were analyzed. Standard t tests were used to examine the change. Tests of differences in proportions were used to evaluate whether Step 2 CK failure rates differed between curricular change groups. Linear regressions were used to examine the relationships between Step 2 CK performance, lag time and incoming MCAT score, and curricular change group. Results: Step 2 CK performance did not change significantly (P = .20). Failure rates remained highly consistent (pre change: 1.83%; post change: 1.79%). The regression indicated that lag time had a significant effect on Step 2 CK performance, with scores declining with increasing lag time, with small but significant interaction effects between MCAT and Step 2 CK scores. Students with lower incoming MCAT scores tended to perform better on Step 2 CK when Step 1 was after clerkships. Conclusions: Moving Step 1 after core clerkships appears to have had no significant impact on Step 2 CK scores or failure rates, supporting the argument that such a change is noninferior to the traditional model. Students with lower MCAT scores benefit most from the change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jurich, D., Santen, S. A., Paniagua, M., Fleming, A., Harnik, V., Pock, A., … Daniel, M. (2020). Effects of Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 after Core Clerkships on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Performance. Academic Medicine, 95(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free