Reconceptualisations of borders in post-soviet Ukraine: Between EU regulations, the soviet legacy and internal political strife

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter investigates reconceptualisations and re-institutionalisations of post-Soviet Ukraine’s borders by focusing on three dimensions: external geopolitical impacts on the reconfiguration of Ukraine’s borders; the rethinking of borders and border issues in academic debates; and the reframing of post-Soviet space and perceptions of borders by the Ukrainian government and various other political actors. The long-term geopolitical significance of Ukraine-Russia border conflicts is difficult to foresee, but it is most likely that border-related issues will increase in visibility as political relations between Russia, other post-Soviet states and the European Union become more complex. In the case of post-1991 Ukraine, border issues have emerged not only in terms of traditional border functions but also as an important factor of nation-building where historical, symbolic and geopolitical issues are closely intertwined. Academic research has a different research focus, methodology and even readership, which can be post-Soviet for publications in Ukrainian or Russian or international for those in English.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Filippova, O. (2016). Reconceptualisations of borders in post-soviet Ukraine: Between EU regulations, the soviet legacy and internal political strife. In The EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Migration, Borders and Regional Stability (pp. 65–78). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315858036-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free