Abstract
The article is a summary of some of the pertinent literature on professionalism, highlighting the difference between how physicians understand professionalism and how other groups e.g. politicians, nurses and hospital managers might view the professionalism of doctors. It partly explains why surgeons have become increasingly 'managerialised' and lost autonomy since the 1970s. I speculate what might be the logical conclusion of this process if surgeons continue to be seen as technicians. The choice facing the surgical profession appears to be between retrenching, by this is meant resisting the challenges to traditional notions of professionalism, or reforming, i.e. to develop new workable models that better serve society and the profession. Some of this might make uncomfortable reading for physicians and surgeons; it is meant to. © 2009 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Canter, R. J. (2009). The importance of international consensus statements in surgery. In ANZ Journal of Surgery (Vol. 79, pp. 100–103). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04822.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.