The importance of international consensus statements in surgery

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The article is a summary of some of the pertinent literature on professionalism, highlighting the difference between how physicians understand professionalism and how other groups e.g. politicians, nurses and hospital managers might view the professionalism of doctors. It partly explains why surgeons have become increasingly 'managerialised' and lost autonomy since the 1970s. I speculate what might be the logical conclusion of this process if surgeons continue to be seen as technicians. The choice facing the surgical profession appears to be between retrenching, by this is meant resisting the challenges to traditional notions of professionalism, or reforming, i.e. to develop new workable models that better serve society and the profession. Some of this might make uncomfortable reading for physicians and surgeons; it is meant to. © 2009 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Canter, R. J. (2009). The importance of international consensus statements in surgery. In ANZ Journal of Surgery (Vol. 79, pp. 100–103). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04822.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free