Argument-explanation complementarity and the structure of informal reasoning

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Argument and explanation are distinct forms of reasoning with an underappreciated complementary relationship. In this essay I define these terms precisely, identify the mischief that results from conflating them, elucidate their complementary relationship and employ this relationship to provide a fruitful approach to analyzing the logical structure of the common editorial. © G. Randolph Mayes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayes, G. R. (2010). Argument-explanation complementarity and the structure of informal reasoning. Informal Logic, 30(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i1.419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free