Abstract
The cyclic behavior of (O–C) residuals of eclipse timings in the sdB+M eclipsing binary NSVS 14256825 was previously attributed to one or two Jovian-type circumbinary planets. We report 83 new eclipse timings that not only fill in the gaps in those already published but also extend the time span of the (O–C) diagram by three years. Based on the archival and our new data spanning over more than 17 years, we re-examined the up-to-date system (O–C). The data revealed a systematic, quasi-sinusoidal variation deviating from an older linear ephemeris by about 100 s. It also exhibits a maximum in the (O–C) near JD 2,456,400 that was previously unknown. We consider two most credible explanations of the (O–C) variability: the light propagation time due to the presence of an invisible companion in a distant circumbinary orbit, and magnetic cycles reshaping one of the binary components, known as the Applegate or Lanza–Rodonó effect. We found that the latter mechanism is unlikely due to the insufficient energy budget of the M-dwarf secondary. In the framework of the third-body hypothesis, we obtained meaningful constraints on the Keplerian parameters of a putative companion and its mass. Our best-fitting model indicates that the observed quasi-periodic (O–C) variability can be explained by the presence of a brown dwarf with the minimal mass of 15 Jupiter masses rather than a planet, orbiting the binary in a moderately elliptical orbit ( ) with a period of ∼10 years. Our analysis rules out the two-planet model proposed earlier.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nasiroglu, I., Goździewski, K., Słowikowska, A., Krzeszowski, K., Żejmo, M., Zola, S., … Karaman, N. (2017). Is There a Circumbinary Planet around NSVS 14256825? The Astronomical Journal, 153(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5d10
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.