Are corporatist labour markets different? Labour market regimes and unemployment in OECD countries

19Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Empirical studies on the unemployment effects of labour market institutions show contradictory results. One explanation is that these institutions affect unemployment differently depending on the regime in which they operate. Because of good labour relations, institutional complementarities and a trade-off between external and internal flexibility, they produce distinctive effects in corporatist regimes. Based on empirical evidence from 20 OECD countries over the period 1985-2008, the author finds that, in corporatist labour markets, strict employment protection legislation reduces unemployment, and unemployment benefits have no negative effect. He also shows that high real interest rates, low capital accumulation and restrictive fiscal policy during recessions increase unemployment. © The author 2013 Journal compilation © International Labour Organization 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sturn, S. (2013). Are corporatist labour markets different? Labour market regimes and unemployment in OECD countries. International Labour Review, 152(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00179.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free