Evaluating Binary Classification Algorithms on Data Lakes Using Machine Learning

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of binary classification algorithms within data lakes, employing a diverse array of metrics. Binary classification algorithms, which categorize inputs into one of two distinct classes, were scrutinized to determine their efficacy. The research focused on the evaluation techniques applicable to these algorithms. Methods for assessing algorithmic efficiency were investigated, including logistic regression, error function, regularization, and ancillary training tools within the dataset. A detailed analysis of the parameters pertinent to classifier evaluation was performed, encompassing accuracy, confusion matrix, precision, recall, decision threshold, F1 score, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A critical comparison between the ROC and Precision-Recall (PR) curves was conducted, with particular attention to the Area Under the Curve (AUC) metric. The study's methodology involved training a classifier on the UCI Machine Learning Repository’s Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset, followed by the calibration of the precision/recall ratio. The findings of this study offer an in-depth examination of various evaluation metrics and threshold optimization techniques, thereby augmenting the comprehension of binary classifier performance. Practitioners are provided with guidance to select suitable metrics and thresholds tailored to specific contexts. Furthermore, the study's insights into the strengths and limitations of these metrics across heterogeneous datasets promote refined practices in machine learning and data analysis, facilitating more strategic model selection and deployment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyko, N. (2023). Evaluating Binary Classification Algorithms on Data Lakes Using Machine Learning. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 37(6), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.18280/ria.370606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free