Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different shade selection techniques and determine the matching success of crown restorations fabricated using digital shade selection techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Teeth numbers 11 and 21 were prepared on a typodont model. For the #11 tooth, six different crowns were fabricated with randomly selected colors and set as the target crowns. The following four test groups were established: Group C, where the visual shade selection was performed using the Vita 3D Master Shade Guide and the group served as the control; Group Ph, where the shade selection was performed under the guidance of dental photography; Group S, where the shade selection was performed by measuring the target tooth color using a spectrophotometer; and Group I, where the shade selection was performed by scanning the test specimens and target crowns using an intraoral scanner. Based on the test groups, 24 crowns were fabricated using different shade selection techniques. The AE values were calculated according to the CIEDE2000 (2:1:1) formula. The collected data were analyzed by means of a one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS. For the four test groups (Groups C, Ph, S, and I), the following mean AE values were obtained: 2.74, 3.62, 2.13, and 3.5, respectively. No significant differences were found among the test groups. CONCLUSION. Although there was no statistically significant difference among the shade selection techniques, Group S had relatively lower AE values. Moreover, according to the test results, the spectrophotometer shade selection technique may provide more successful clinical results. [J Adv Prosthodont 2024;16:38-47]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Şahin, N., & Ural, Ç. (2024). Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 16(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.1.38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free