THE IMPACT OF RELATIVE INCOME ON FARMERS' PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AND ANXIETY INHIBITION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

Abstract

Background: human cognition is not static. Early human cogni-tion is different from modern human cognition. In the cognitive process of modern people, the information received by the senses from the external world is encoded and translated, and then presented in the form of abstract causal logic through the logical analysis and empirical verification of scientific thinking. However, the cognitive model of early human beings depended on mythological language and metaphorical thinking. Therefore, our purpose in this work is to study the basic operation principle of this mythical metaphorical thinking and the psychological motivation of human beings to use this way of thinking, and to explore the relationship and significance between human scientific cognition and myth. Metaphorical cognition, and emotional behavior. Subjects and Methods: Based on Cassirer's mythological meta-phorical thinking theory, this study analyzes the comparative texts of ancient and modern human mythological language, and obtains a similar understanding of digital cognition, orientation cogni-tion, attribute cognition and language cognition. Knowledge information is followed by comparative research. In this way, we can confirm the principles followed by human beings and the psychological motivation to apply these principles in the cognitive model of metaphorical thinking relying on mythological language. In order to better study the basic principles of metaphorical thinking and the changes of emotional behavior in mythological language, this study uses the measurement tool and the interpersonal emotion regulation scale (ierq) compiled by Hofmann et al. (2016) to measure how individuals regulate their emotions through others. The scale includes 4 factors and 20 items in total. Five point meter, The higher the score, the greater the degree of using inter-personal style to regulate emotion High. In this study, the results of confirmatory factor analysis are as follows: χ 2 / DF = 7.921, RMSEA = 0.077, CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.889, indicating that the scale has good structural validity in this study. Internal one Consistence α The coefficient is 0.94, which is the sum of the above four factors α The coefficients are 0.84, 0.77, 0.84 and 0.82 respectively. At the same time, the implicit positive emotion subscale is adopted. The scale adopts the implicit positive emotion subscale compiled by Quirin et al. (2009) and revised by Dong Shanchuan (2016). The scale adopts 4-point scoring to evaluate the correlation between 6 meaningless synthetic words and 3 positive emotion words. The higher the total score, the higher the implicit positive emotion and the internal consistency α The coefficient is 0.93. Results: humans who rely on mythological language and metaphor-ical thinking show a specific cognitive model. Mythology and early language reveal human cognition of themselves and the external world in an intuitive and concrete way. Modern languages are usually more abstract and logical. However, the comparison between scientific cognitive group and mythological metaphorical cognitive group reflects the principle of "replacing the whole with the part". On the other hand, the psychological motivation of human beings to use this way of thinking is to replace all unfamiliar and difficult