Changes in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in Hypertensive Postmenopausal Women: Comparison Between a Calcium Channel Blocker vs Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Regimen

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Postmenopausal women are at greater risk for hypertension-related cardiovascular disease. Antihypertensive therapy may help alleviate arterial stiffness that represents a potential modifiable risk factor of hypertension. This randomized controlled study investigated the difference between an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker in reducing arterial stiffness. Overall, 125 postmenopausal hypertensive women (age, 61.4±6years; systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP], 158±11/92±9mmHg) were randomized to valsartan 320mg±hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (n=63) or amlodipine 10mg±HCTZ (n=62). The primary outcome was carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) changes after 38weeks of treatment. Both treatments lowered peripheral blood pressure (BP) (-22.9/-10.9mmHg for valsartan and -25.2/-11.7mmHg for amlodipine, P=not significant) and central BP (-15.7/-7.6mmHg for valsartan and -19.2/-10.3mmHg for amlodipine, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayoz, D., Zappe, D. H., Meyer, M. A. R., Baek, I., Kandra, A., Joly, M. P., … Periard, D. (2012). Changes in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in Hypertensive Postmenopausal Women: Comparison Between a Calcium Channel Blocker vs Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Regimen. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 14(11), 773–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free