Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Which is better?

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Over the last decade there has been a changing trend in technique for radical prostatectomy from open surgery to minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology. This review evaluates the validity of this change by reviewing the current literature and comparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Recent Findings: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy shows equivalent and possibly better results when compared with radical retropubic prostatectomy with respect to intraoperative and postoperative parameters including continence, potency and quality of life. Time is still needed to determine long-term oncologic results, but initial findings are promising. Summary: This review supports the current trend in shifting the standard of care for radical prostatectomy from an open to a robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, T., & Torrey, R. (2011). Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Which is better? Current Opinion in Urology, 21(3), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834493b3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free