Relationships of diverse apoptotic death process patterns to mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) evaluated by three-parameter flow cytometric analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, it has been proposed that novel methodologies are needed to re-evaluate apoptotic cell death, as studies of apoptosis have shown it to be a complex process. Since mitochondria are key regulators in cell death pathways, we developed a simultaneous 3-parameter flow cytometric analysis that incorporates the change in mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ m) in an Annexin-V [for phosphatidyl-serine (PS)] and propidium iodide (PI) assay system (3 parameters with 4 colours), and evaluated the apoptotic process using various haematological malignant cell lines and death triggers. The present method enabled visualization of cell composition during apoptosis and captured complicated molecular events. For example, apoptotic cells that lost Δψm did not always externalize PS, while some late apoptotic cells had polarized Δψm. The findings of unchanged PS-externalization and aberrant cell death suggest that there is no relationship of PS externalization and apoptosis with an unknown apoptotic mechanism. Based on PS-externalization, sensitivity to staurosporine, and the combination of cell lines and triggers, the apoptotic process was classified into 2 types. Importantly, most of our findings could not be observed by PS-PI and Δψm assays when independently performed. Our method may be useful for examining mitochondrial-related apoptosis and death signalling pathways, as well as screening novel apoptosis-inducing cancer drugs. © 2012 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suzuki, Y., Hasegawa, H., Tsuji, T., Tsuruda, K., Sasaki, D., Ishihara, K., … Kamihira, S. (2013). Relationships of diverse apoptotic death process patterns to mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) evaluated by three-parameter flow cytometric analysis. Cytotechnology, 65(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-012-9455-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free