Data quality assurance and control in cognitive research: Lessons learned from the PREDICT-HD study

5Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We discuss the strategies employed in data quality control and quality assurance for the cognitive core of Neurobiological Predictors of Huntington's Disease (PREDICT-HD), a long-term observational study of over 1,000 participants with prodromal Huntington disease. In particular, we provide details regarding the training and continual evaluation of cognitive examiners, methods for error corrections, and strategies to minimize errors in the data. We present five important lessons learned to help other researchers avoid certain assumptions that could potentially lead to inaccuracies in their cognitive data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westervelt, H. J., Bernier, R. A., Faust, M., Gover, M., Bockholt, H. J., Zschiegner, R., … Paulsen, J. S. (2017). Data quality assurance and control in cognitive research: Lessons learned from the PREDICT-HD study. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1534

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free