MRI versus conventional radiologic examinations in the evaluation of the craniovertebral and cervicomedullary junction.

18Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

MRI is superior to conventional radiographic techniques for demonstrating anatomic CMJ distortion and compression in all patients, regardless of the pathology involved. Because of the high incidence of osseous CVJ abnormalities in patients with a Chiari malformation, complete evaluation of these patients requires examination of the osseous CVJ by conventional radiographic methods in addition to the MRI study. Conventional techniques are also helpful for the complete evaluation of inflammatory and osseous lesions involving the CVJ. Occasionally, designation of tumors as intra- or extraaxial may not be possible by MRI alone; additional studies may be necessary. The failure of MRI to demonstrate calcification is a limitation in the evaluation of a variety of pathologic entities, especially neoplasms in which the demonstration of calcification may be a clue to the histologic diagnosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smoker, W. R., Keyes, W. D., Dunn, V. D., & Menezes, A. H. (1986). MRI versus conventional radiologic examinations in the evaluation of the craniovertebral and cervicomedullary junction. Radiographics : A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.6.6.3317556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free