'No Solution to the Immediate Crisis': The Uncertain Political Economy of Energy Conservation in 1970s Britain

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article traces one aspect of Britain's approach to the political economy of energy conservation. It focuses on the forecasting work of Royal Dutch Shell and the deliberations of the Heath government. In the late 1960s, the oil major Shell predicted that oil-producing states would impose an embargo on oil-consuming states. Energy conservation policies would be necessary. In tracing the reception of Shell's 'crisis' scenario and its proposed resolution, this article details how these ideas were received by Edward Heath's Conservative government, particularly its 'think-Tank', the Central Policy Review Staff. In the short term, interventionist policies were proposed so as to demonstrate Britain's ability to operate without ever-increasing oil consumption, while in the long term the idea was that the energy-saving capacities of a freely-operating market could address the problem. The article recounts the confusion these proposed conservation policies provoked, and how the second idea gradually coalesced and ultimately outlasted the Heath government, providing one justification for the eventual privatisation of Britain's formerly nationalised energy industries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turnbull, T. (2022). “No Solution to the Immediate Crisis”: The Uncertain Political Economy of Energy Conservation in 1970s Britain. Contemporary European History, 31(4), 570–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777322000625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free