What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life

7Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a great demand for information on how workers evaluate the quality of their jobs. In response to this demand, a multitude of questionnaires has been developed, which are presented under different names and stress different aspects of work life. It is therefore difficult to see what questionnaire is best suited to one’s information demand. This problem can be solved by considering the content of the different questionnaires through the same conceptual lens, focussing on the meaning of each of the constituting questions separately. In this paper, we adapted Veenhoven’s conceptualization of qualities of life in general to the work setting, which gave us a matrix of 9 nested notions of perceived quality of a worker’s work life, and then used this matrix to classify the meaning addressed in 12 questionnaires. Some of these questionnaires appear to address a clear meaning, while others cover a mix of meanings. These contents are presented in a tabular overview here to allow users to select the questionnaire the most adapted to their needs. This approach can also be used to develop new questionnaires on perceived quality of work life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaucher, R., & Veenhoven, R. (2022). What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life. Quality and Quantity, 56(3), 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01165-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free