Open access metadata: Current practices and proposed solutions

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nearly every major publisher offers open access content of some sort, but open access metadata standards are non-existent amongst content providers. Users, librarians, content providers, and technology vendors who offer OpenURL resolvers and discovery services all stand to benefi t from standardized ways to indicate what content is open access and what is not. Additionally, all stakeholders would benefi t from a standardized method by which one can ascertain what form of open access any content may be; indeed, there are many definitions of open access. There is ample evidence that every publisher handles their content metadata differently and this creates ineffi ciencies in the scholarly information supply chain and leads to user confusion. Many initiatives are currently working on solutions to these problems including the NISO KBART workgroup, NISO's Open Discovery Initiative, and NISO's very recently created Open Access Initiative. There are also pre-existing concepts based on services, such as CrossRef's CrossMark service and discovery systems that hold promise with respect to open access content and metadata. © Chad Hutchens 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutchens, C. (2013). Open access metadata: Current practices and proposed solutions. Learned Publishing, 26(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free