Comparison of a novel, single-lead atrial sensing system with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in patients without antibradycardia pacing indications results of a randomized study

51Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background-Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are the main cause for inappropriate therapy by implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (ICDs). For better rhythm discrimination, an atrial electrogram is helpful and usually obtained from an additional atrial lead, even in the absence of sinus node or atrioventricular nodal disease. An A+-ICD system with integrated atrial sensing rings mounted 15 to 18 cm from the tip of an ICD lead may obviate the need to implant a separate atrial lead. The aim of the study was to compare the novel A+-ICD and a conventional dual-chamber (DR)-ICD. Methods and Results-Two hundred forty-nine patients with standard ICD indications but no requirement for antibradycardia pacing were randomized to receive an A+-ICD (n=124) or a DR-ICD (n=125). Implantation details, need for ICD system revision, long-term sensing, documented arrhythmia episodes, and the respective rhythm discrimination during follow-up were analyzed. The implantation time was significantly shorter in the A+-ICD group (67±30 vs 79±30 minutes, P=0.003). Mean P-wave amplitudes were 3.5±0.8 mV (A+-ICD) and 3.2±0.6 mV (DR-ICD) and remained stable during the follow-up period of 12 months. Surgical revision was necessary in 13 patients in the DR-ICD and 10 in the A+-ICD group. All 593 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes were correctly discriminated. Sensitivity and specificity of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia discrimination were not different between the study groups. Conclusions-The novel A+-ICD system can be implanted faster and is equivalent to a standard DR-ICD with regard to the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. It represents a useful alternative to obtain atrial sensing. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sticherling, C., Zabel, M., Spencker, S., Meyerfeldt, U., Eckardt, L., Behrens, S., & Niehaus, M. (2011). Comparison of a novel, single-lead atrial sensing system with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in patients without antibradycardia pacing indications results of a randomized study. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.110.958397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free