Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Clinical Guide to Navigating Diagnostic Pluralism

20Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The controversies surrounding the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and International Classification of Diseases have generated significant debate across the psy-sciences. This debate has been further fueled by the launch of the Research Domain Criteria as a framework to facilitate advances in neuroscientific research, a renewed emphasis on dimensional models of psychopathology, currently exemplified by the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology, and development of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual by the psychodynamic community. In this article, we provide a clinical overview of recent debates surrounding categorical and dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis, offer a critical assessment of proposed alternatives, and discuss how clinicians can navigate a plurality of diagnostic frameworks. Our discussion emphasizes that diagnostic frameworks need to be contextualized within the process of a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and their advantages and disadvantages should be understood in relationship to the theoretical orientations and practical needs of clinicians.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aftab, A., Banicki, K., Ruffalo, M. L., & Frances, A. (2024, August 1). Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Clinical Guide to Navigating Diagnostic Pluralism. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. Wolters Kluwer Health. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001791

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free