Lung ultrasound score and in-hospital mortality of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) score could quantitatively reflect the lung aeration, which has been well applied in critically ill patients. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between LUS score at admission and the risk of in-hospital mortality of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Toachieve the objective of this meta-analysis, we conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify relevant observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. We employed random-effects models to combine the outcomes, considering the potential influence of heterogeneity. Results Thirteen cohort studies with 1,022 hospitalized patients with ARDS were included. Among them, 343 patients (33.6%) died during hospitalization. The pooled results suggested that the LUS score at admission was higher in non-survivors as compared to survivors (standardized mean difference = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 0.91, p < 0.001; I2 = 25%). Moreover, a high LUS score at admission was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality of patients with ARDS (risk ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.81, p = 0.002; I2 = 46%). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results in studies with LUS score analyzed with 12 or 16 lung regions, and in studies reporting mortality during ICU or within 1-month hospitalization. Conclusion Our findings suggest that a high LUS score at admission may be associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality of patients with ARDS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, D., & Qi, Y. (2024). Lung ultrasound score and in-hospital mortality of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12890-023-02826-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free