How should physicians use their authority to name a stigmatizing diagnosis and respond to a patient’s experience?

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Patients with delusional infestation are unlikely to agree to take the mainstay of treatment—antipsychotic medication. While stressing the general importance of truth telling in medicine, we suggest that, in some cases of delusional infestation, patients’ lack of decision-making capacity will—provided a series of criteria are met—justify briefly withholding their diagnosis. We acknowledge this action as a kind of deception with ethical pitfalls and discuss those related to prescribing antipsychotic medication without frank disclosure. We recommend full disclosure of a delusional infestation diagnosis when the patient is recovered, despite this action’s potential to exacerbate stigma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bartels, J., & Ryan, C. J. (2018, December 1). How should physicians use their authority to name a stigmatizing diagnosis and respond to a patient’s experience? AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.1119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free