Rebalancing of professional identity roles in an integrated maternity and neonatal care setting designed to increase parent autonomy: a qualitative study among health professionals

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This case-based qualitative study explored the professional identity as experienced by health professionals working in an integrated maternal-neonatal ward when their practice changed from a “paternalistic” model, in which physicians and nurses were in charge, to a shared or “consumerist” model, to increase parent autonomy. We analyzed transcripts of focus group discussions and interviews with 60 health professionals on their experiences with empowering parents and described factors associated with themes of professional identity. The changes most affecting professional identity were the constant proximity of parents to their newborns and the single-family room design. These changes influenced three themes of professional identity: (1) connectedness and relationships (2) communication, and (3) competencies. A fourth theme, values, beliefs, and ethics, affected how the health professionals coped with the changes in the first three themes. When empowering parents of newborns in a hospital setting, health professionals experience beneficial as well as threatening shifts in their professional identities. Values, beliefs, and ethics associated with family integrated care helped health professionals to embrace their new roles, but other values, beliefs and ethics could create barriers. Continuous professional identity development in a patient-inclusive team is a topic for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stelwagen, M., Westmaas, A., Van Kempen, A., & Scheele, F. (2025). Rebalancing of professional identity roles in an integrated maternity and neonatal care setting designed to increase parent autonomy: a qualitative study among health professionals. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 39(4), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2343843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free