Fracture strength of three all-ceramic systems: Top-ceram compared with IPS-empress and in-ceram

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture loads and mode of failure of all-ceramic crowns fabricated using Top-Ceram and compare it with all-ceramic crowns fabricated from well-established systems: IPS-Empress II, In-Ceram. Materials and methods: Thirty all-ceramic crowns were fabricated; 10 IPS-Empress II, 10 In-Ceram alumina and 10 Top-Ceram. Instron testing machine was used to measure the loads required to introduce fracture of each crown. Results: Mean fracture load for In-Ceram alumina [941.8 (± 221.66) N] was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of Top-Ceram and IPS-Empress II. There was no statistically significant difference between Top-Ceram and IPS-Empress II mean fracture loads; 696.20 (+222.20) and 534 (+110.84) N respectively. Core fracture pattern was highest seen in Top-Ceram specimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quran, F. A., & Haj-Ali, R. (2012). Fracture strength of three all-ceramic systems: Top-ceram compared with IPS-empress and in-ceram. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 13(2), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1123

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free