Ta-Nehisi Coates's between the World and Me: A Phenomenology of Racialized Conflict

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article investigates the structure of racialized conflict experience. Embarking from a conflict event in Ta-Nehisi Coates's autobiography Between the World and Me and contrasting the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Alfred Schutz with insights from Black phenomenology, I argue that Coates's experience discloses conflictual, but intertwined, modes of being-in-The-world. Further, it presents an instantiation of a particular kind of conflict, i.e., corporeal conflict. Corporeal conflict applies whenever the body is politicized, i.e., when it becomes the marker for traits representative of a rival political group. Understood this way, racialized conflict is always political. I conclude the article with some remarks on the shortcomings of two dominant conflict theories in political philosophy and the potential for an alternative, phenomenological approach that enables new ways of engaging the other in conflict. The analysis is preceded by a meditation on the role of the White researcher in critical philosophy of race.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rautenberg, N. (2024). Ta-Nehisi Coates’s between the World and Me: A Phenomenology of Racialized Conflict. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 10(1), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2022.41

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free