A counterexample to a conjecture of Gurvits on switched systems

18Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider products of matrix exponentials under the assumption that the matrices span a nilpotent Lie algebra. In 1995, Gurvits conjectured that nilpotency implies that these products are, in some sense, simple. More precisely, there exists a uniform bound ι such that any product can be represented as a product of no more than ι matrix exponentials. This conjecture has important applications in the analysis of linear switched systems, as it is closely related to the problem of reachability using a uniformly bounded number of switches. It is also closely related to the concept of nice reachability for bilinear control systems. The conjecture is trivially true for the case of first-order nilpotency. Gurvits proved the conjecture for the case of second-order nilpotency using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. We show that the conjecture is false for the third-order nilpotent case using an explicit counterexample. Yet, the underlying philosophy behind Gurvits' conjecture is valid in the case of third-order nilpotency. Namely, such systems do satisfy the following nice reachability property: any point in the reachable set can be reached using a piecewise constant control with no more than four switches. We show that even this form of finite reachability is no longer true for the case of fifth-order nilpotency. © 2007 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Margaliot, M. (2007). A counterexample to a conjecture of Gurvits on switched systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(6), 1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2007.899047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free