The myth of URANS

Abstract

Since the 1990s, RANS practitioners have observed spontaneous unsteadiness in RANS simulations. Some have suggested deliberately using this as a method of resolving large turbulent structures. However, to date, no one has produced a theoretical justification for this unsteady RANS (URANS) approach. Here, we extend the dynamical system fixed point analysis to create a theoretical model for URANS dynamics. The results are compared to URANS simulations for homogeneous isotropic decaying turbulence. The model shows that URANS can predict incorrect decay rates and that the solution tends towards steady RANS over time. Similar analysis for forced turbulence shows a fixed modelled energy of about 30% of total energy, regardless of the model parameters. The same analysis can be used to show how hybrid type models can begin to address these issues.