Faith Schools and Indoctrination: A Response to Michael Hand

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Michael Hand has recently advocated the abolition of faith schools on the grounds that they may indoctrinate their pupils. In this rejoinder, I aim to show that the assumptions underpinning his thesis are seriously flawed. Initially, I question whether faith schools set out to indoctrinate. I then consider whether they are able to do so (particularly in a secular society) and if we can ever know that a faith school, rather than some other agency, has been responsible for indoctrination. Finally, I cast doubt on Hand's key assumption concerning pupils’ perceptions of their teachers. I contend that it is theoretically problematic and empirically unsupported. © 2003, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Short, G. (2003). Faith Schools and Indoctrination: A Response to Michael Hand. Theory and Research in Education, 1(3), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001003005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free