Abstract
This article applies the concept of work meaningfulness to bridge disparate literatures concerning journalists’ feelings toward their work. Highlighting the importance of both objective structures and subjective meaning-making capacities, it defines Meaning in Journalistic Work (MJoW) as the level of, and the interplay between, the structural and symbolic dimensions of autonomy, recognition, and a sense of belonging. The article posits that the structural dimension (workplace autonomy, good working conditions, and identification with the media organization) is deteriorating due to the digitalization of work. Consequently, the symbolic dimension (participation in autonomous meaning systems, acknowledgment from peers and the public, and professional affiliation) is gaining increased importance. By distinguishing between the structural and symbolic dimensions, and making the implicit connection between them explicit, the MJoW-framework offers a novel and comprehensive understanding of what makes digital reporting meaningful. Such an understanding is highly important at a time when journalism is constantly contested, working conditions are worsening, occurrences of threats and harassment are increasing, and work practices are being reshaped at record speed.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Olsen, G. R. (2026). Digitalization and Meaning in Journalistic Work (MJoW): The Increasing Importance of the Symbolic Dimension. Digital Journalism, 14(3), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2487862
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.