Argumentation skill profile using "toulmin Argumentation Pattern" analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure

9Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to know profile of argumentation skill high school student at Kabupaten Subang. To achieve this goal, researcher conducted a descriptive study to analysis student test results of argumentation skill of 35 students XII SMAN. Data collection using argumentation test which has validation by expert and then it is analyzed using TAP (Toulmin Argumentation Pattern) which consist of some components such a data, claim, warrant, backing, and rebuttal on the topic of hydrostatic pressure. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The result of this research show the student's scientific argumentation skill is still low, this is proven by 54% average claim score, 38% data, 29% warrant, 35% backing and 35% rebuttal. These findings will serve as a basis for further research on innovative learning models that can improve students' argumentation skill.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free