Lack of foreign aid effectiveness in developing countries between a hammer and an anvil

32Citations
Citations of this article
147Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines reasons for the ineffectiveness of foreign aid interventions in developing countries, using the examples of Yemen, Egypt and Jordan. It starts with a review of two contradictory theories used to explain foreign aid ineffectiveness: the public interest perspective (PIP) and the public choice perspective (PCP). On the basis of the PCP, this article shows that deficiencies are locked within a vicious circle of a poor policy and institutional environments in developing countries and donors' self-interest. The article ends by proposing a third explanation of foreign aid ineffectiveness that goes beyond the scope of the PCP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elayah, M. (2016). Lack of foreign aid effectiveness in developing countries between a hammer and an anvil. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 9(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2015.1124519

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free