Estimation of Depth and Length of Defects from Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements: Verification with Simulations, Experiments, and Pigging Data

72Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method is the most widely used non-destructive testing techniques for detection and characterization of defects in product transmission pipelines. The maximum safe operating pressure is a crucial parameter in practice, which is predicted with respect to the length, width, and depth of defects. In a previous work, an algorithm is devised to detect and estimate the width of the defect based on MFL signals. In this paper, an efficient method based on axial MFL level contours is devised to estimate the length of the defect. This method uses the patterns of signal level contours in the region corresponding to the defect's area. In addition, a Gaussian radial basis function neural network (NN) is trained to approximate the depth of the defect. The NN is fed with the estimated length, width, and signal peak-To-peak values, and the output of the network is the estimated depth. The proposed detection and estimation method is applied to MFL measurements to detect and determine the sizing of metal loss defects. The efficacy and accuracy of the proposed methods are examined through a rich set of sample defects that contains simulated defects, designed defects that are carved on a real pipe by milling, and actual pigging data validated by several dig up verifications. Obtained results confirm the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed depth and length estimation method along with the previously devised detection and width estimation methods, in characterization of metal loss defects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kandroodi, M. R., Araabi, B. N., Bassiri, M. M., & Ahmadabadi, M. N. (2017). Estimation of Depth and Length of Defects from Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements: Verification with Simulations, Experiments, and Pigging Data. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2016.2631525

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free