Aesthetic local search ofwind farm layouts

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The visual impact of wind farm layouts has seen little consideration in the literature on the wind farm layout optimisation problem to date. Most existing algorithms focus on optimising layouts for power or the cost of energy alone. In this paper, we consider the geometry of wind farm layouts and whether it is possible to bi-optimise a layout for both energy efficiency and the degree of visual impact that the layout exhibits. We develop a novel optimisation approach for solving the problem which measures mathematically the degree of visual impact of a layout. The approach draws inspiration from the field of architecture. To evaluate our ideas, we demonstrate them on three benchmark problems for the wind farm layout optimisation problem in conjunction with two recently-published stochastic local search algorithms. Optimal patterned layouts are shown to be very close in terms of energy efficiency to optimal non-patterned layouts.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm

725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental issues associated with wind energy - A review

353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen's model

293Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wind farm repowering optimization: a techno-economic-aesthetic approach

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayo, M., & Daoud, M. (2017). Aesthetic local search ofwind farm layouts. Information (Switzerland), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/info8020039

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

80%

Energy 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free